It has taken me a while, but I finally bought a PlayStation VR or a PSVR as it is also known. This isn’t exactly a review, but it is a brief article about my experience with the device that I have own for a little over a week.
First off, something like VR can be a make or break from your first impressions, and when I first put on the VR headset I did have a wow moment – which is obviously a very good thing!
First things first, I am and have always been interested in VR. As far as I see it, VR is the next evolution of gaming, and though things like 4K TV screens and the compatible devices (Xbox One X, PS4 Pro) upgrade the resolution and polycount, they don’t fundamentally change the experience – VR does.
There was a moment when Playing London Heist, which features on VR Worlds, where I was sitting in the passenger seat of a van with the window open, leaning out of the window and back into the van, just for the novelty. That’s the thing with VR, there is a level of novelty, that could wear off, but right now it is fantastic. The ability to walk through Skyrim and look up at the trees or clouds as you walk down a path is fantastic. As a game designer, spending hours on creating the scenery that the action takes place in, I often feel that the work and effort are somewhat overlooked. But now you can really stop and smell the roses, or more accurate, get up really close to inspect them – and I do.
There is nothing like VR that puts you in the game, in the driving seat or cockpit, or in the environment that the game takes place in. IT instantly makes the whole game so much more believable, even without the pixel count you might get on a 4K TV.
My History With VR
A few years ago I went to a games convention in London and queued for a few hours to try an early version of the Oculus Rift, and though the demo wasn’t one I necessarily choose, it did pique my interest. My concerns at the time were the low-resolution screen and the that the screen or field of view was quick narrow – like looking at a small square screen in front of you.
Now, the PSVR is the cheapest entry into VR in the market, which also includes the oculus rift and HTC Vive, only recently has the Oculus Rift come down to the £350 price point of the PSVR, and you then need a pretty powerful computer to run it. Sure, you need a PS4 to run the Playstation VR, but you can get a PlayStation for around £200 which is much lower than an Oculus compatible PC.
Impressions and why you should buy a PlayStation VR now.
I bought my PlayStation in the Black Friday sales, which means I got the headset, the camera, VR worlds (game), and Skyrim (game) fro £249.99 as opposed the £349.99 for just the headset as it was priced the week before.
When you load up the screen, or more prominently when you load up a game, you will be amazed by the fact it manages to fill your vision. It’s not like looking at a square in front of you, but a full eye-filling experience. The next thing I noticed was that though the pixels were visible, they weren’t as visible as I had expected. Reading the below article, I found that they tried to get screens with the best pixel to black ratio they could – the black being the bits that surround the pixels (look up close at your tv to see what I mean). On the PSVR screen the black pixel surrounds are almost unnoticeable, and though it can’t really compete with retina displays or 4K TV’s, it is a lot better than I had imagined.
The next thing I noticed is that when you look at the menu screen, it is like looking at a cinema-sized screen, and the sense of scale is amazing!
When I was younger, my parents bought me a pair of glasses that were popular at the time, that was advertised as “like viewing a 100” TV from 10 feet away, or something similar.
After trying them once, and feeling like a terrible ungrateful child, I told my parents that it was more like looking at a postage stamp from one foot away. Needless to say, they were returned. The thing is, those would show a fixed screen in front of each eye, the sense of scale is created by the close proximity to the eye. The VR experience and head tracking mean it can give the impression of an IMAX sized screen in front of you because you actually have to turn your head to see the far sides – this sense of scale wouldn’t have been possible without VR.
The whole experience really is an interesting one, and everyone that I have enticed into using it has had an awe moment as they look all around themselves and their surroundings. Though some companies are touting the long-term appeal of AR over VR, such as Microsoft and Apple, I am one of the few people that strongly disagree. VR is much the same as TV and cinema, the potential for escapism is amazing. You can visit your favour Star Wars or Lord of the Rings locations, have a 007 style chase and shoot-out, or any other experience you can imagine.
I personally can’t wait till you can play Halo or Uncharted in VR, and though the technology can and will improve (4K etc), I for one find it a very exciting time for VR and can’t wait to see what’s next.
TIME spoke with Sony Senior Research Engineer Dr. Richard Marks about the new platform (Marks has been with Sony for 17 years, and played a central role in the inception of Sony’s EyeToy and PlayStation Move motion controllers). In our chat, he offered a high-level overview of how the technology works, and what drove the company to make certain choices regarding it.
PlayStation VR can produce strikingly clear images for two reasons
“There’s two basic things here, the panel and the lenses. Those are the two main things that affect visual quality,” says Marks. “Apple has popularized the term ‘retinal display,’ which is this idea that you can’t see the pixels in an electronic screen. Now imagine you’re going to blow them up into this huge field of view, like you’re looking at a giant TV. When you do that, suddenly you can see the pixels again because they’re so big.”
“You’ve probably heard of the screen door effect, which is one of the most popular negatives about virtual reality. That’s the black space between the pixels, and it looks kind of like a screen, and that’s what you don’t want. So you want your panel to have very little black and lots of color, meaning the red, green and blue. Our panel just has a better red, green and blue ratio compared to the blackness. That’s one factor. Having more light-emitting portions of the panel and less of those black circuit electronics is good.”
“And then you have the refresh rate, the screen update rate, which for us is 120 frames per second. It’s updating what’s on the screen very often, and that update rate makes the image seem very solid to you when you’re looking at it.”
“The next thing is the optics, and the optics should be really well matched to the pixels. In our headset they’re blowing everything up but also softening the view, so it looks like a continuous image and you don’t see the discrete pixels. You don’t want to soften it too much, because you’ll get a blurry image, and you don’t want to soften it not at all, because then you’ll see the really sharp edges of things. So that’s another factor.”
“And the other part of the optics component is that there’s something called the eye box, and that’s about how much you can move your eyes around in front of the lenses and still get a good image. We wanted it to be such that when you put it on, there was a big range, so you didn’t have to be exactly in the right spot to still get a good image. We have such a big eye box that we don’t require you move the lenses at all.”
Lighter isn’t always better
“If you’re going to start from scratch and say, ‘let’s make a head-mounted display,’ you’d think you’d want the most minimal, lightest thing possible. But that’s not necessarily right if you want the product to be rugged and consumer friendly and easy to use. Even in terms of comfort, what our experience with other products over many years showed us, is that having it be balanced and not pulling your neck is probably the most important thing.”
“Also, and this varies by culture, but there’s a strong bias to not having anything touching your face. When something’s touching your face, you feel a little bit claustrophobic about it in a different way. And then also it traps heat in there, and having your face get hot is obviously uncomfortable.”
“So a lot of it is not having it touch your face, not pull your neck forward. And also pressure on your face, besides just touching it. When you push on your face, that can be really uncomfortable and lead to headaches. So having all the weight distributed on the top of your head instead and pushing down through your body rather than thrust up against your face and torquing your neck, that’s the fundamental design behind our headset.”
The PlayStation Move controllers benefit from you not being able to see them
“The tracking of the Move’s been tweaked some, but it’s also that it’s running on PlayStation 4 now, so we have more compute power” says Marks. “One of the biggest things is that it has the new camera, and it’s a higher resolution stereo camera, so it can triangulate the depth better. Whereas on PlayStation 3 it was a single camera and had to use the size of the sphere as its way to get depth, which isn’t as accurate.”
“The other thing is that when you’re in virtual reality, you can’t see your hand or the real Move obviously, so you don’t have a reference to compare it to. So there can be a bit more latency, and you won’t notice it.”
The company focused on sitting/standing experiences in part to be more developer-friendly
“I’m a technology person, so I like the technology Valve’s promoting with the lighthouse boxes and walking around,” says Marks. “But it feels like it’s much more suited to location-based experiences, where you have a VR arcade or something with someone overseeing the experience for you.”
“When you have it as just a single person, where the cable’s in the way, setting it up, finding the space you need, not everyone has the same amount of space, so everyone sets it up differently. And then the developer has to author an experience that deals with that different setup. That’s asking a lot from developers, especially at this stage, when we’re very new to VR, to make it that in everyone’s home it’ll do the right stuff. Seated or standing without walking, it’s much more constrained, so developers don’t have to factor in the different room spaces.”
And the shape of virtual reality to come…
“I think on the display side, the resolution is the most straightforward thing to address,” says Marks. “Two sets of things need to happen. You need to improve the display resolution, and then you need the graphics to drive that resolution. That’s why the graphics companies are very excited about the future of VR [laughs].”
“I think what you’ll maybe be surprised at, the area that will probably get a lot of excitement and energy, is input in VR. So how you’re interacting with things. You’re seeing stuff like eye tracking already being talked about from some smaller companies, and then other kinds of input, hand tracking. All those things and then haptic feedback and things like that. Those are all other areas that aren’t on an axis where they necessarily get better with time, so it’s hard to predict them.”